A license to drive is a ticket to freedom for 16 year-olds and,
in many cases, for their parents who don't have to chauffeur them
around anymore. But the price is steep - more than a third of all
deaths during the teens' next two years will be from crashes. Do
16 year-olds get too much freedom too soon? If so, what to do?
Some policy measures can help keep them alive.
High school driver education is not the answer. In many families,
it may be the most convenient way for beginners to learn how to
drive. But it doesn't produce safer drivers. In terms of crash
experience, learning to drive this way is about the same as
learning from parents or private driving schools.
A promising approach to the overall problem involves modifying 16
year-olds' initial driving - helping them learn by controlling
progression to unrestricted driving, lifting controls one by one
until a young driver "graduates" to full licensure. The crux is
to influence when beginning drivers may drive and with whom.
Restrictions typically include limits on teen passengers, a
prohibition on night driving, and/or a requirement that beginners
drive only with an older, experienced driver in the car. The
blood alcohol concentration specified for teens may also be lower
than the one for older drivers.
The first graduated licensing program was implemented in New
Zealand in 1987. It's effective, and similar systems were adopted
last year in two Canadian provinces, Ontario and Nova Scotia.
-
-
A lot of people think of the restrictions as being inhibiting,
curtailing . . . but I like to think of [graduated licensing] in
terms of a protective mechanism," says Herb M. Simpson, director
of the Traffic Injury Research Foundation of Canada, adding that
parents like it. "The difficult thing is to be able to say no.
It's compelling when you have teens who want to be able to use
the vehicle, and the parent has to say no. One of the advantages
we've heard from parents is that graduated licensing puts them in
the position that they're simply complying with rules.
Driving is a far more complex task than most 16 year-olds
realize. Allan F. Williams, the Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety's senior vice president for research, explains that
beginners "have to accumulate a lot of experience before they're
able to combine steering with scanning the environment and
putting it all together, all at the same time, behind the wheel."
That's not all. Williams adds that "handling a car responsibly
takes more than mastering the skills that are involved. It takes
the maturity that can only come with time."
Sixteen year-olds "can't learn it overnight," says David F.
Preusser, another researcher who has studied the problem of
teenage drivers. "It takes a long time to learn what to do and
how to predict danger. It also takes time to develop the maturity
to make responsible decisions behind the wheel."
Restricting initial driving to daytime hours is part of creating
time to learn. It's not just that night driving is a more
difficult task. It also "tends to be recreational," Preusser
points out. "The 16 year-olds go out with their friends. They're
thinking about having fun. And then, if they also have a ton and
a half of metal, glass, and plastic hurtling down the highway at
50, 60, or 70 miles an hour, this is a dangerous set of
circumstances." Graduated licensing heads off such circumstances
by introducing night driving only after on-the-road experience is
gained during the day.
So far, not one U.S. state has a full-fledged graduated program.
Interest in the idea is on the increase, though, and we may be on
the verge of following the Canadian example. "It took several
years in Ontario," Simpson remembers, "not to convince the public
but to convince the political body that the public really wanted
graduated licensing. And to do that required a groundswell of
activity. There must have been 15 inquests, and in every one of
those cases the death could have been averted . . . . These were
all very poignant and very dramatic reminders of the potential
power of graduated licensing."