To investigate the effects of aging and visual impairment on
driving and visual performance, Australian researchers fielded a
sample group of 46 subjects to execute a series of driving
performance tests on a closed-road circuit. Subjects included 10
young visually normal drivers (mean age 22.6 years), 18 elderly
drivers with no visual impairments (mean age 67.7 years), and 18
elderly drivers with early cataracts (mean age 68.6 years).
Researchers gathered data on driving tasks including: peripheral
awareness, maneuvering, reversing, reaction times, speed
estimation, road position, and time to complete the course.
Joanne M. Wood and Rod J. Troutbeck reported the methods and
results of this study in their article, "Effect of Age and Visual
Impairment on Driving and Vision Performance," presented at the
January 1994 Transportation Research Board annual meeting in
Washington D.C. Information in this summary is from that
report.
The population is aging, and the number of elderly drivers is
increasing. Statistics show older drivers have more traffic
convictions and accidents per mile than any other age group and
are more frequently cited for being at fault in accidents.
Studies suggest elderly drivers have slower reaction times and
poorer merging behavior than their younger counterparts.
Although there is no strong research evidence showing that
increased accident rates result from decreased visual acuity, the
lens does become yellow and less transparent with age and pupils
become smaller and less able to dilate in dim light. The study
described by Wood and Troutbeck is one of a series of ongoing
studies attempting to determine possible correlation between
alleged deterioration in driving performance in elderly drivers
and age-related changes in visual function.
Subjects volunteered for this study from an advertisement in a
motoring magazine. The sample group participated in
assessments of driving and visual performance. Driving
performance was tested on a closed circuit course taking about
five minutes to execute. Researchers tested and evaluated
peripheral awareness, reaction time, speed estimation ability,
road position, total time to complete the course, maneuvering
skill, and reversing proficiency. In the laboratory, researchers
used standard tests of visual function to assess visual acuity,
functional visual field (involving central and peripheral search
within empty and cluttered fields), letter identification in
high- and low-contrast environments, glare sensitivity, and
reaction time (more a test of information processing than visual
acuity).
Results showed "elderly subjects had poorer driving performance
as assessed on a closed-circuit driving course compared with the
young subjects, and the elderly subjects with early cataracts had
poorer driving performance than those who were visually normal.
. ." (pp. 87-88). All subjects had sufficient visual acuity to
pass high-contrast vision tests given at driver testing centers
and would be eligible to hold a driver's license.
Significant differences in results occurred on several driving
and vision performance tests. In driving performance
assessments, elderly subjects with early cataracts showed
increased total driving times, peripheral reaction times, and
maneuvering times when compared with younger drivers. While
elderly subjects with cataracts took longer to complete the
course and accomplish maneuvering tasks than visually normal
older drivers and younger drivers, they did not make
significantly more errors during these tasks than other groups.
Elderly visually normal drivers did not perform as well on
peripheral reaction time tests and had more maneuvering errors
and poorer scores on speed estimation than did young drivers.
Visual performance assessments showed that older drivers were
more sensitive to light scatter than younger drivers and had more
problems discerning low-contrast images. Reaction-time tests on
the driving course (measured by the time taken to touch the brake
when a red light came on either in the driver's central or
peripheral viewing area) and in the laboratory showed longer
times for older drivers than younger drivers, but results were
less significant in the laboratory than on the road. Older
subjects also had more difficulty in locating a target within a
cluttered array than did younger persons.
Wood and Troutbeck cited an earlier study suggesting that when
older drivers were informed about possible hazards due to natural
deterioration in visual acuity, they may regulate their own
driving practices and reduce risks by avoiding difficult driving
situations. Since elderly drivers appear to drive and respond
more slowly, results of this study may indicate older drivers
should avoid peak-hour traffic that requires a given speed to
maintain traffic flow and demands quicker reaction times in
response to more complex situations. Results showing older
drivers, particularly those with early cataracts, have greater
sensitivity to glare and difficulty in detecting low contrast
images might suggest they have poorer vision for nighttime
driving and are almost blinded by intense sunlight. Older
drivers, especially those whom doctors diagnose with early
cataracts, might be well advised to avoid night driving or
driving in late afternoon when the sun is on the horizon.
Study results also suggested that changes in highway signs and
driver testing might assist older drivers. While larger signs
may help, the authors of this study stated that it may be
important to place signs more strategically. Stop and Yield
signs generally occupy conspicuous positions; however,
information signs frequently compete with advertising signs and
other distracting background. Placing highway warning and
information signs in uncluttered positions would assist all
drivers, especially older drivers experiencing difficulty in
picking out low-contrast images in a cluttered array. Since
elderly drivers react more slowly to warning signs, increased
distance between warning and hazard might be helpful. Finally,
visual acuity and driving performance change gradually, and older
drivers may not be aware of changes. Current measures of visual
acuity used in drivers' test centers employ high-contrast letters
that do not highlight changes in vision due to age and early
cataracts. Using low-contrast letter charts and functional field
measures for driver testing might increase awareness of visual
acuity problems that appear to affect driving performance.