![]() |
|
Road Injury Prevention & Litigation Journal |
|
April, 2001 TranSafety, Inc. (360) 683-6276 Fax: (360) 683-6719 E-mail us |
|
|
| (This article is reproduced, with permission, from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's February 17, 2001 (Volume 36, Number 2) Status Report.) |
Think there's not much difference? There is when it comes to driving.
At 16 1/2, he looks about the same as he did 6 months ago, when he got his driver's
license. But there's a substantial change when it comes to the likelihood of a crash.
According to two new studies, it's immediately after teenagers get their full-privilege
licenses and begin to drive without supervision that their crash rates are highest. Then
the rates go down during subsequent months so that, by the time beginners have been
driving unsupervised for 6 months, their crash rates are 40 percent lower than when
they first got their licenses. This is the main finding of a new study conducted in Nova
Scotia.
It's not that 16 1/2 is a magic age. It's that getting a few months of experience behind
the wheel helps a lot. Then the decline in crash risk continues more gradually over the
next year and a half.
Supervised drivers have few crashes:
The big problem isn't among the least experienced drivers on the road, those with
learner's permits. Other drivers may give them a wide berth, but learning drivers who
are supervised by licensed adults have very few crashes. It's when the beginners start
to drive unsupervised that crash rates go up.
"The low-risk learner's period followed by a spike in crash rates when drivers first get
licenses indicates the need for a graduated system," says Dan Mayhew of Canada's
Traffic Injury Research Foundation, lead author of the Nova Scotia study. He's
referring to the graduated licensing systems for young beginning drivers that are being
adopted in the United States and Canada.
"There's a powerful argument for extending the period of supervision and then phasing
in full driving privileges, keeping new license holders out of the highest risk driving
situations." This is what graduated licensing does by extending the process of earning
full privileges.
U.S. Study Shows First Month Is Worst:
For another study conducted in the United States, researchers looked at the crash
rates of young drivers in relation to the number of months and miles driven since
licensure. They found that the risk of a crash during the first month of licensure is
substantially higher than during any of the next 11 months. The likelihood of a citation
also is higher during the first month than in any month the rest of the year.
When viewed as a function of cumulative miles driven, the risk of a crash or a citation
is highest during the first 500 miles after getting a full-privilege license to drive without
supervision.
"The findings show teenagers face a substantially higher crash risk during the first
weeks and the first miles of licensure, when most teens begin to drive independently
for the first time," says Anne McCartt of the Preusser Research Group, lead author of
the U.S. study.
Findings of the U.S. and Nova Scotia studies aren't confined to North America. A 1998
study of new drivers in Norway, where the licensing age is 18, reported a sharp decline
in crash risk per kilometer driven during the first few months of licensure. Australian
researchers have reported similar results.
Taken together, these studies add scientific evidence to the common-sense case for
graduated licensing (see Status Report, Dec. 4, 1999; on the web at
http://www.highwaysafety.org). Such programs restrict driving during the first year of
licensure, creating an interim period that leads up to full unrestricted licensure. The
idea is that beginning drivers will improve with on-road experience, which initially
should be acquired in low-risk circumstances--that is, during daylight hours and without
teenage passengers in the car.
Details of Canadian and U.S. Studies:
The Nova Scotia study focuses on a sample of drivers who obtained their learner's
permits during 1990-93, before a provincial graduated licensing program was
introduced. Driver records and police reports were used to compare month-to-month
changes in the crash rates of newly licensed drivers.
Their crash rates went from 123 collisions per 10,000 drivers during the first month of
licensure to 73 in the seventh month, a decrease of 41 percent. The crash rate
continued to decline gradually over the two years of the study until it was 60 percent
lower at the end of the study period compared with the first month the teenagers were
licensed.
For the U.S. study, a total of 911 teenagers in Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, and
New York were surveyed. Crash involvements and citations were examined for the first
year of licensure and for the first 3,500 miles driven. The crash rate per 100 drivers
was 5.9 in the first month after licensure, dropping to 3.4 in the second month and
ranging from 1.3 to 3.0 during the subsequent 10 months. Per 10,000 miles driven, the
crash rate was 3.2 for the first 250 miles, 1.8 for the second 250 miles, and 1.3 for the
third.
The per-mile crash rate also was calculated for each of the first 12 months of licensure,
falling from 2.3 crashes per 10,000 miles in the first month to 1.1 per 10,000 in the
second month. Declines continued in subsequent months.
To obtain a copy of "Changes in Collision Rates among Novice Drivers During the First
Months of Driving" by D. Mayhew et. al. and/or "Crashes and Traffic Citations of Newly
Licensed Teens in Relation to Months Elapsed and Miles Driven After Licensure" by A.
McCartt et al., write: Publications, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1005 North
Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201.
