![]() |
|
Road Engineering Journal |
|
December 1, 1997 TranSafety, Inc. (360) 683-6276 Fax: (360) 335-6402 [email protected] |
|
| (The following information is from “NCHRP Report 386: Design and Evaluation of Large-Stone Asphalt Mixes.” Reproduced here is “Chapter 1: Introduction.” This chapter summarizes the findings described in the report. A copy of the complete publication can be purchased from TranSafety, Inc. for $28 plus $4 shipping and handling. The report is 141 pages in length and was published in 1997.) |
Chapter 1: Introduction
This report presents a practice for the design and analysis of dense- and open-graded,
large-stone mixes (LSM) and guidelines for the construction of hot-mix asphalt (HMA)
pavements incorporating LSM. Work was accomplished under NCHRP Project 4-18,
“Design and Evaluation of Large Stone Mixtures.” For the purposes of this study, LSM
are defined as HMA paving mixes containing maximum aggregate sizes between 25
and 63 mm (1 and 2.5 in.). Though typically used as base layers, LSM can serve as
surface layers where rutting (permanent deformation) is a problem or concern.
In keeping with current directions in asphalt paving mix design technology (typified by
the Superpave system for dense-graded mixes), the design practice provides the option
of two levels of volumetric design complexity, including the use of performance-related
mixture analysis tests.
The Level 1 LSM design method is appropriate for low-volume roads and requires only
minimal materials testing. With this method, personnel use a spreadsheet-based
computer program to estimate an optimum design on the basis of measured or reported
grading of available aggregate stockpiles; the designer can select the desired air voids
content (VTM) of the compacted LSM.
The Level 2 dense-graded LSM design is intended for higher volume roads. It is an
iterative process that begins with a Level 1 design and ensures that the mixture
provides a required resistance to permanent deformation (rutting). The objective is to
design a mix with a coarse aggregate skeleton with good stone-on-stone contact
capable of carrying the intended traffic load. Use of this method requires specific
knowledge of the measured gradations of all aggregate stockpiles; the computer
program is used to build a coarse stone skeleton and fill its voids with the smaller
aggregates from succeeding stockpiles. Optimum asphalt binder content is then
estimated on the basis of desired levels of voids in mineral aggregate (VMA), VTM, and
other factors. Finally, a performance-related mixture test (the Superpave simple shear
test [SST] procedures [AASHTO TP 7] or a uniaxial [static] compressive creep test) is
used to ensure that the LSM meets minimum rutting resistance criteria.
The Level 2 LSM design method employs the Superpave gyratory compactor for
specimen preparation. Depending on the maximum aggregate size in the LSM and
other specific aggregate and volumetric properties, the angle of the gyration may
increase substantially from the 1.25 deg specified in AASHTO TP 4 for conventional,
dense-graded mixes. Other gyration compactors may be used if their operating
characteristics can be adjusted to meet the requirements of AASHTO TP 4.
A Level 2 open-graded LSM design incorporates the same volumetric design principals
used for dense-graded LSM to ensure that the mixture has an adequate permeability,
but does not require mix testing to evaluate rutting resistance. A draindown test is
used to verify or make final adjustments to the optimum asphalt content selected by the
computer program.
In general, the construction of LSM pavements demands application of the same sound
principles of production, placement, and compaction used for conventional (maximum
aggregate size of 25mm [1 in.] or less) paving mixes. Therefore, the LSM pavement
construction guidelines emphasize procedures to prevent or remedy the most frequent
problems characteristic of LSM, which have slowed its adoption and use in some
states–segregation, aggregate fracture, and equipment wear.
The report has two parts. The first part, Chapters 2 through 5, is intended principally
for the practitioner responsible for LSM design and pavement construction and includes
the following:
The appendixes form the second part of the report; they are intended principally for
specialists interested in the experimental results upon which the practical products in
Chapters 2 through 4 are based. The appendixes include the following:
The Level 1 computer program is written to run as a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel,
Version 5.0 or higher. It is available for downloading from the Transportation Research
Board’s Internet World Wide Web site at www2.nas.edu/trbcrp/229a_35a.html (go to
the icon at the bottom of the status block). Instructions for using the computer program
are in Annex X1 of the mix design practice in Chapter 2.
