![]() |
|
Road Management & Engineering Journal |
|
November, 1999 TranSafety, Inc. (360) 683-6276 Fax: (360) 335-6402 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Monday, September 27, 1999) — The American public
overwhelmingly favors an overhaul of federal motor vehicle safety standards, stepped
up attention to intersection safety, and more frequent license testing for the nation’s
youngest and oldest drivers, according to a new Louis Harris poll released today.
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates), an alliance of consumer, safety
and insurance organizations founded in 1989, commissioned Harris to conduct the
independent survey. In conjunction with the release of the Harris survey, Advocates
issued a report called “Stuck in Neutral: Recommendations for Shifting the Highway
and Auto Safety Agenda into High Gear” that provides more than 90 remedies to
dramatically reduce death and injury on the nation’s highways in the 21st century.
Among the key findings of the Harris poll were:
“It appears that the American people are way out in front of most politicians when it
comes to highway and auto safety,” said Judith Lee Stone, President of Advocates. “It
is time for our political leadership to catch up with our nation’s consumers on this
issue.”
“The American people’s appetite for strong rule-setting in consumer matters is high,”
said pollster Harris. “People reject turning over this function to the state and localities
in its entirely.”
Highway crashes are the number one cause of death of Americans under age 30.
Since 1982, while alcohol-related traffic deaths have dropped by 37% (from 25,100 in
1982 to 15,900 in 1998), NON-alcohol-related highway fatalities have increased by
36% (from nearly 18, 800 in 1982 to 25,500 in 1998)
In 1990, nearly 44,500 people were killed in highway crashes. By 1998, the highway
death toll dropped to nearly 41,000. “Some might say this is great progress, but can
we, as a civilized society, say that our nation has done all it can when 41,000
Americans are likely to lose their lives this year?,” Stone said. “Our nation is stuck in
neutral when it comes to the waging a real fight against our highway death toll,” added
Stone. “We want this turn of the century to be the beginning of a renaissance period
for highway and auto safety.”
To help jump-start that process, Advocates today released a report outlining more than
90 recommendations to dramatically reduce death and injury on our highways. The
report — called “Stuck in Neutral: Recommendations for Shifting the Highway and Auto
Safety Agenda into High Gear” – covers a wide array of safety concerns about the
vehicle, the driver and the road itself. The report calls for federal action to revamp car
and truck safety standards. It also outlines legislative action to improve safety belt and
child restraint protection, to stop drunk driving, to combat red light running, and to
address growing concerns about older and younger drivers.
Among its recommendations for overhauling federal auto safety standards, Advocates
urged the U.S. Department of Transportation to:
“The Harris poll showed that consumers are willing to pay more to protect themselves
and their families,” said Joan Claybrook, President of Public Citizen and a member of
the Advocates national board. “Consumers demand and expect that the latest
technologies, the best products based on the latest knowledge, will be incorporated
into the new vehicles they buy.”
Safety concerns were also expressed today in response to U.S. Census Bureau
predictions of large increases in teen and older (65 years +) drivers in many states over
the next decade. From 1988 to 1998, there was a 12 percent drop in total traffic
fatalities in our country. But for persons 70 years or older, the number of fatalities
increased by 17 percent. As the Baby Boom generation begins to reach retirement
age, the population of drivers over 65 is expected to grow by 60 percent by year 2025.
Most people have a driving test only when they get a driver’s license for the first time.
Advocates called on the states to more frequently test older drivers and to consider
“graduated licensing” for older drivers. Much like traditional graduated driver licensing
that is used to allow new drivers to adjust to increasingly more difficult driving
situations, graduated systems for older drivers work in the reverse by reducing driving
privileges according to the drivers’ ability to handle the demands of different types of
driving situations.
This form of graduated licensing allows trained licensing authorities to assist by making
evaluations of driving skills. Under such systems, a driver’s license can be custom
tailored to the driver’s specific abilities and may increase such limitations as day driving
only, use of special equipment like wide-angle mirrors or requiring a companion in the
car.
Another approach to address the older driver issue is a law recently enacted in
Missouri giving doctors and family members permission to report an older driver whose
driving is questionable, and to permit the Motor Vehicle Administration to test the older
driver. Both approaches were praised for reevaluating the older driver’s performance
based on driving skill rather than on age alone.
Advocates also urged each state to enact graduated licensing laws for new drivers.
Last year, 14 percent of all the drivers involved in fatal crashes were between 15 and
20 years of age, in spite of the fact that teen drivers account for only 7 percent of all
licensed drivers.
On July 14, 1998, a newly-licensed 16 year-old driver caused a multiple fatal crash
near a high school in Bethesda, Maryland, that resulted in three deaths, including that
of teen passenger Matthew Waymon of Takoma Park, Maryland. Matthew Waymon’s
father, Todd Waymon, spoke at today’s news conference, and urged all states to enact
graduated licensing laws and to require more frequent testing of younger drivers. “We
need to make sure that every state enacts a Graduated Licensing Law that phases in
the full driving privilege of new drivers,” Waymon said. “Also requiring our youngest
drivers to be tested more frequently would surely save lives.”
Waymon also backed Advocates’ call on each state to enact laws allowing standard
enforcement of seat belt laws. “If our nation is serious about highway safety, there is
nothing more important the states can do to protect our families than to pass
comprehensive seat belt laws that require everyone, of all ages and in all seating
positions to buckle up.”
Another issue that attracted broad public support in the Harris poll was intersection
safety. According to the Federal Highway Administration, from 1992 to 1998, the
number of fatal crashes at intersections has increased by 16 percent, while all other
types of fatal crashes have increased by only 5 percent. Drivers who ran red lights
were involved in 89,000 crashes, causing more than 1,000 violent deaths and 80,000
injuries last year. “Red light running is a growing problem, and it’s not confined to a
specific demographic profile,” said Jacqueline Gillan, the Vice President for Advocates.
“Red light running is one of the most dangerous things any driver can do. I found this
out the hard way.” Last year, Gillan was injured in a crash caused by a red light runner
at a Maryland intersection.
The Harris poll found growing strong support for intersection cameras to catch red light
runners. Safety advocates are also urging states to consider engineering design
solutions to dangerous intersections. With rising pedestrian traffic on many urban and
suburban streets, pollster Harris said “it is not a surprise to find a solid 70 percent
majority of Americans believe that more attention should be paid to this new danger
zone.”
Alan Maness, Federal Affairs Director and Counsel for State Farm Insurance, pointed
out that red light running cameras at intersections are part of a new wave of effective
technology that is showing great promise in its early stages. The public is right on
target when it comes to intersection safety, and we urge every state and community to
adopt stop this lifesaving technology.”
The Advocates’ report also recommended that Congress withhold federal highway
funds from states that fail to enact laws to require standard enforcement of state seat
belt laws, to set the legal limit for drunk driving at 0.08% BAC, and to require
motorcyclists of all ages to wear safety helmets.
A national cross-section of 1,005 randomly chosen adults 18 years of age and over
was surveyed by Peter Harris Research Group, under contract to Louis Harris. The
interviewing took place from August 17 – August 26, 1999.
The findings of the Lou Harris poll and the Advocates’ report on “Stuck in Neutral:
Recommendations for Shifting the Highway and Auto Safety Agenda into High Gear”
can be found on the Advocates web site: http://www.saferoads.org.
